![]() The same lockup issue occurs for both the 32-bit and 64-bit version of the ReoLink Windows client.ĭ) Most often one, or more, cameras do not immediately display their "live" video content. The software/hardware of the NVR, or the Windows "ReoLink client" software. Quitting and restarting the Windows "Client" software always "fixes" the issue, so I'm not sure that this is caused by Having 'too many cameras' visible on the screen at once etc.,) skipping to new timeline points, switching displayed cameras, This happens when one clicks quicklyĪmong the available software features (i.e. This is a HUGE problem/oversight at these large 4K H.264 file sizes when reviewing stored video content from remote sites having limited UPSTREAM bandwidth which is a very common requirement.Ĭ) The Windows client (v.7.2.33) easily "locks up" and must be restarted. ReoLink software for this NVR/Camera combination:Ī) No longer any "Fast-Forward" capability when the "target" is the NVR (as opposed to any of their otherī) No longer any "Fluent"(highly compressed, low-frame-rate, and small image pixel count) stream available for download. Even at a reduction to 12 fps and setting the maximum bit-rate to 1024 bps, one is looking at about 900 MB-per-30 minutes-per-4K-camera.Ģ) The following features are NO LONGER AVAILABLE within the Windows (v.7.2.33) or Mac client version of the Now the shortcomings of ReoLink's support of this great video hardware:ġ) No H.265 compression algorithms available (meaning HUGE H.264 file sizes). The 16 channel ReoLink NVR is not capable of supporting 16 4K cameras (no doubt because of both 100 Mbps Ethernet bandwidth at full 4K frame rates and video bit-rates).Īlso as mentioned there is no ONVIF support for these "B800" model 4K cameras. ![]() In addition, these cameras MUST be used only with the "8" channel version of ReoLink's NVR RLN8-410. ![]() Very bad move on their part in my opinion. This would have offered almost 50% better compression-factor (read half-the-file-sizes) for the same video content/quality.įor whatever "licensing" or "technical reason, ReoLink had to drop the ball on H.265 compression support. These cameras were "originally" intended to support the newer, and much more efficient, "H.265" video compression protocol. These new "B800" true 4K UHD cameras are the real deal.Īs many previous comments and reviews note, these newest true-4K cameras are running behind on ReoLink's "software" support of their tremendously capable hardware. This system is very good for its price category.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |